Water ingress is one of the most destructive and frequent challenges faced by apartment owners in Australia. When an owners corporation delays or refuses to fix a structural defect, the impact on a lot owner’s daily life, property value, and rental income can be significant.
If you are dealing with strata not fixing a water leak in NSW, understanding the legal framework is essential. The legislation provides specific mechanisms to enforce maintenance, claim compensation for damages, and resolve deadlocks between owners and committees.
This guide outlines the statutory duties of the owners corporation, the process for escalating disputes through mediation and the tribunal, and the limits surrounding compensation for property damage.
What happens if your strata is not fixing a water leak in NSW?
If an owners corporation fails to repair common property, lot owners have the legal right to enforce action through formal mediation and tribunal orders. The governing legislation imposes an absolute duty on the strata scheme to maintain the building, meaning that excuses like a lack of funds in the administrative fund or delays with insurance claims are rarely accepted as valid legal defences.
Data indicates that “failure to maintain common property”—primarily related to water ingress—accounts for over 40% of all strata-related applications to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT). As ageing apartment stock and higher density living increase across the state, these disputes have become increasingly common.
The Section 106 Strict Duty to Repair
The foundational law governing common property maintenance in New South Wales is found within Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) - Section 106.
Under Section 106(1), an owners corporation must “properly maintain and keep in a state of good and serviceable repair” the common property. Legal precedents have consistently established that this is a “strict” and “non-delegable” duty.
Key Insights regarding the Statutory Duty:
- Absolute Responsibility: The strata committee cannot avoid responsibility by blaming the original builder, waiting indefinitely for a building defect claim, or claiming there are insufficient funds in the capital works fund.
- Damage to Lot Property: If a failure in the common property (such as a deteriorated roof membrane or failing external brickwork) causes damage to the internal lot property, the scheme is generally liable for rectifying the source of the leak and the consequential internal damage.
- Proactive Maintenance: The duty extends beyond merely fixing things when they break. It involves proactive maintenance to ensure the property remains in a state of “good and serviceable repair.”
Can you claim compensation for water damage?
Lot owners are legally permitted to claim compensation for losses stemming from the owners corporation’s failure to maintain common property. Under Section 106(5) of the Act, an owner can recover reasonably foreseeable damages.
This may include:
- Replacement of ruined floorboards or carpets.
- Repainting of water-damaged walls or ceilings.
- Loss of rental income if the property becomes uninhabitable and a tenant breaks the lease.
Limitation Period Risks
It is critical to note that there is a strict time limit on claiming these damages. Under Section 106(6), an owner has exactly two years to lodge a claim from the date they first became aware of the loss. Delaying formal action while waiting for the strata manager to “get around to it” is a significant risk that may result in an owner losing their right to compensation entirely.
Practical Example: A Sydney Apartment Leak
Consider a scenario involving a lot owner in a Sydney apartment complex. During heavy rain, a failure in the external common property window seals causes water to pool inside the lot, warping expensive timber floorboards.
The strata committee initially investigates but delays the repair for eight months, arguing that they need to pass a special levy resolution at the next Annual General Meeting (AGM) to fund the facade work.
In this scenario:
- The strata scheme remains in breach of its strict duty under Section 106.
- The lot owner has a valid claim not only for the window seal repair but for the replacement of the warped floorboards.
- If the owner waits more than two years from the date the floorboards were damaged to file a claim, they forfeit their right to financial compensation for the flooring, even if the strata eventually fixes the window.
Process Overview: From Dispute to Resolution
Resolving a maintenance dispute involves a structured legal pathway. Owners cannot apply directly to the tribunal without first attempting formal mediation.
| Dispute Phase | Responsible Body | Estimated Timeframe | Typical Costs (AUD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Internal Resolution | Strata Committee / Strata Manager | 1–4 weeks | N/A |
| 2. Compulsory Mediation | NSW Fair Trading | 6–10 weeks | Free |
| 3. Formal Application | NCAT (Consumer & Commercial) | 3–6 months | ~$60.00 (Individual) |
| 4. Expert Evidence | Independent Building Consultants | Varies | $1,500 – $4,000+ |
How to force repairs through NSW Fair Trading and NCAT
When internal communication breaks down, the formal resolution process begins.
Step 1: Compulsory Mediation
Before initiating legal action, legislation requires lot owners to apply for free mediation through NSW Fair Trading. According to the NSW Fair Trading: Resolving Strata Disputes guidelines, a neutral mediator will attempt to help both parties reach a written agreement.
Due to recent surges in strata living, wait times for mediation can extend to 6–10 weeks. If the owners corporation refuses to attend, or if the parties cannot agree on a timeline for the repair, Fair Trading will issue a formal “Notice of Unsuccessful Mediation.”
Step 2: Applying to NCAT
Once the mediation certificate is obtained, owners may apply to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal. As outlined in the NCAT Fees and Charges Schedule, the standard application fee for an individual is approximately $60.00, though this is adjusted annually.
When filing, owners generally seek orders under Section 232 of the Act, compelling the owners corporation to carry out specific repairs. Successful NCAT applications typically rely heavily on independent expert reports. The tribunal often faces an “expert deadlock” where the lot owner’s inspector and the strata’s inspector disagree on the source of the water leak. In such cases, NCAT may appoint a joint independent expert to determine the liability.
Multi-State Legislation Differences
While this guide focuses on NSW, the principles of common property maintenance apply nationally, albeit under different legislative frameworks.
| State | Governing Legislation | Statutory Duty to Maintain | Dispute Resolution Body |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSW | Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 | Section 106: Strict and non-delegable duty. | NSW Fair Trading → NCAT |
| VIC | Owners Corporations Act 2006 | Section 46: Duty to repair and maintain common property. | Dispute Settlement Centre → VCAT |
| QLD | Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 | Section 152: Duty to maintain in good condition. | BCCM Commissioner → QCAT |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Can I withhold my strata levies if they refuse to fix a leak?
No, withholding strata levies is legally risky and generally counterproductive. Under Australian strata legislation, the obligation to pay levies is entirely separate from the owners corporation’s duty to maintain the building. Withholding payments places you in arrears, which may strip you of your voting rights at general meetings, incur penalty interest, and expose you to debt recovery action.
Who pays for the NCAT case if the strata scheme loses?
If the owners corporation loses a case at NCAT and is ordered to perform repairs and pay damages, the funds must come from the body corporate’s accounts. This is usually drawn from the administrative fund or capital works fund. If there are insufficient funds, the strata committee must raise a special levy to cover the tribunal’s orders. Because you are a member of the owners corporation, you will pay a portion of this special levy based on your unit entitlement.
What is considered common property in a water ingress claim?
Determining common property depends on your specific strata plan. However, in most NSW strata schemes registered after 1974, structural elements like external boundary walls, roofs, original waterproof membranes, external doors, and windows are designated as common property. Internal fixtures, paint, and floor coverings laid by the owner are typically considered lot property.
Can the strata committee delay repairs due to a lack of funds?
Legally, a lack of funds is not a valid excuse for failing to maintain common property. If the capital works fund is depleted, the owners corporation has a statutory obligation to raise the necessary funds to carry out required repairs, usually by passing a special levy resolution at a general meeting.
Understanding your rights and the financial mechanics of your strata scheme is vital when navigating maintenance disputes. The financial health of an owners corporation—reflected in its levy notices and fund balances—directly impacts its ability to resolve structural issues like water leaks.
StrataClear helps Australian strata owners analyse their levy notices, interpret complex building financials, and track how their administrative and capital works funds are being managed. By ensuring your scheme’s financials are transparent and adequately provisioned, you can better anticipate special levies and hold your strata committee accountable for building maintenance.
Ready to understand your strata report?
Upload your strata report to get a comprehensive, easy-to-understand analysis of financial health, special levies, and critical buyer questions in minutes.
Analyse your report now